home

Review of Jafar Panahi’s Offside

Jafar Panahi is a reknowned Iranian filmmaker who chooses to deal with controversial topics in his work. His movies (Crimson Gold, The Circle, among others) have been heralded abroad and banned at home. In many ways, then, it’s incredible that Jafar Panahi was able to make his latest movie, Offside, about women trying to sneak into an Iranian stadium to watch a soccer match.

offside_poster.jpg

Panahi knew that taking on the subject of female football fans in Iran would be controversial, and so tried to make his movie quietly so as to avoid the censors. In an interview, he described how even his best attempts to avoid notice were ultimately unsuccessful.

We tried to be very discreet and avoid any mention in the press. However, five days before the end of the shoot, a newspaper published an article stating I was directing a new film. The military immediately gave orders to interrupt the shoot. We were instructed to bring them our rushes to be verified. I immediately announced to the official in charge of cinema in Iran that this was out of the question, and that I would not allow a single soldier during the final days of the shoot. Luckily, there were only a few scenes left to shoot, inside a minibus, so we just left the military zone and continued filming sixty kilometers outside of Tehran.

But the difficulties Panahi faced from overzealous authorities is nothing compared to those encountered by the subjects of his movie. They are the female football fans who so desperately want to watch Iran play Bahrain in a 2005 match that would decide which team would go to the World Cup.

The movie opens on a bus, as Iranian fans make their way to the Azadi Stadium to see the crucial qualifier against Bahrain. The scene is joyous, with fans hanging out the windows and singing, psyching themselves up for the game. But one fan is more nervous than excited. This fan, it turns out, is a she and shes are not allowed into stadiums in Iran.

The female fan (we never find out names of any of the women in the film) is going in disguise, trying to avoid the glare of police at the stadium. But her cover is blown by her own nervousness and she is taken to a holding pen, along with other female football fans.

offside_photo.jpg

It’s in this holding pen, which is really just metal barricades shaped into a rectangle, that the majority of the movie takes place. The action of the movie, if it can be called that, is mostly the captive female fans attempting to persuade their captors to let them watch the game. Those looking for dramatic shots of the action on the field will be sorely disappointed; this is a movie about the repressive realities of contemporary Iranian life that just happens to have a crucial World Cup qualifier as its background.

The Azadi Stadium is as good a place as any to show many of the injustices that exist in Iran today. The rationales that the female fans are given for not being allowed into the stadium are as numerous as they are absurd: women will be harmed by the coarse language in the stadium, they should not be looking at attractive young male players, soccer is just not a women’s game, etc. The most argumentative of the detained female fans points out that Japanese women were allowed in to a game at the same stadium and wonders if “my only problem is I was born in Iran?”

offside_photo1.jpg

The soldiers who become the women’s captors are hardly enthused with having to keep the fans from watching the game. One soldier is completely disinterested in his work, another continually sneaks peeks at the game, and a third laments that his conscription has taken him so far from his family farm. The root of the problem does not lie with the soldiers; they are merely forced to carry out the unjust laws created by those above them.

That seems to be the point Panahi is most interested in making. Individually, Iranians may support female fans’ right to go to the stadium, but the authorities in the country create a system that forces some citizens to oppress others.

Panahi also clearly hopes that Iranians might take collective action to stop these injustices from occurring. When a female fan escapes from her captor with the aid of some male fans, it is impossible not to see Panahi’s desire that more Iranians take a stand against injustice in their country. As the famous quote goes, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

jafar_panahi.jpg

Jafar Panahi

Offside is undoubtedly an interesting, it is not the most engaging movie. Its topic may be unique, but the film itself is all too predictable. The soldier least interested initially in the female fans’ plight comes to see their perspective by the end of the film. The women are detained, but in the end are released onto the streets of Tehran to celebrate with their countrymen and women. Watching Offside, you’ll rarely be surprised by what’s coming next.

The one surprise in the movie is how little soccer there is. Leaving the theater, my friend and I concurred that we would have liked to see shots of what sounded like an intense game. Of course, as we quickly realized, not showing the game was an intentional decision on Panahi’s part and that we had little right to complain. We, two twenty-something American men, had been denied a peek at the game during the ninety-minute movie; women in Iran have been denied the right to watch soccer for their entire lives.

offside_photo2.jpg

2 Responses to “Review of Jafar Panahi’s Offside”

  1. Culture of Soccer » Blog Archive » What I'm Reading: June 9, 2007
    June 9th, 2007 18:49
    1

    [...] Club soccer is not the only place to make money. The World Cup is among the most profitable of sporting events in the world. But as Simon Kuper pointed out this week in the Financial Times, the benefits Germany has accrued from hosting last summer’s tournament were more than monetary. The most lasting effect of the 2006 World Cup may be an improving of the German “brand.” As Kuper writes, foreigners’ opinions of Germany improved as did those of Germans about their own country. The successful hosting of the World Cup, Kuper believes, helped to put to rest outdated views of Germans as “xenophobic neo-Nazis.”One country whose soccer dealings may not be improving its national image is Iran. This week, a game between the Iranian national team and a German club team was cancelled due to “technical problems.” The match would have marked the first time an Iranian women’s team had played outside the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution. The details behind this game in many ways mirror the situation Iran’s government is embroiled in over its nuclear program. Just as the government employs a policy of reaching out to, then pulling back from Westerners in relation to its nuclear program, so too did the government initially agree to allow this game to go ahead before changing its mind. Those who suffer as a result are Iran’s female players (which comes as little surprise, given how reluctant the country is to allow its women to be involved with the game, even as fans). [...]

  2. Kathy
    April 27th, 2008 11:42
    2

    Great review of Offside. I watched the movie last night, and really appreciated the chance to see what life is like in Iran. I hadn’t thought about it until you mentioned it, but you’re right about why the filmmakers didn’t show more soccer scenes. Very astute!
    I like your review so much that I link to it from my blog posting today. http://www.kchristieh.com/blog/?p=979
    Thanks!!

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments:

  • SANUSI YAHAYA: hello ,please can you do me a great favour by sending me...

  • Omar aKa "O": Mashallah , god bless all of those who embrace Islam , let...

  • Carlos: It is interesting to read of soccer in this way. And yet rarely...

  • ninaz: good article…gives me more insight on sapir-whorf...

  • Prashant: Hi everyone, It’s not intrusion but an humble request to...

Archive

Categories

  • Blogs

  • En Español

  • Fan-Run Sites

  • General

  • Podcasts

  • UK

  • USA